RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.39 OF 2015

Case between Mohammed Rafi et al vs Baiju regarding rent and damages

Court

Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-09-22

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Fri, 09/22/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners including Mohammed Rafi and others filed a rent control petition seeking damages for use and occupation. Respondent Baiju agreed to pay monthly damages and terms of compromise were accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Compromise terms accepted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court allowed the petition based on the lawful compromise terms between the parties.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

The terms of the compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

The compromise shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mohammed Rafi
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rosina
Party Age: 30
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Bincy
Party Age: 28
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Iyyakkutty @ Malummu
Party Age: 61
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Baiju
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

IA 2133/2017

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K.P. Shareef
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. M.P. Hussain
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Compromise terms

Outcome: Accepted

Description:

Agreed monthly damages, advance repayment terms, and arrears payment

Evidence: