Case Summary
Mohammed Najeeb filed a suit against Sathya and Karthick. The court dismissed the suit due to lack of proper steps taken to issue and serve summons.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit after noting that the plaintiff did not produce necessary paper publications and failed to properly take steps to issue and serve summons.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not meet procedural requirements.
The court found that the plaintiff did not meet procedural requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff did not meet procedural requirements.
The court found that the plaintiff did not meet procedural requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that steps not properly taken to issue and serve summons.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed. IA 02/25 dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Najeeb
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathya
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthick
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. A Ajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mekha Dinesh K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to failure to produce paper publication and take necessary steps for summons.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed. IA 02/25 dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Najeeb vs Sathya et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Najeeb vs Sathya et al regarding dismissal of suit