Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by M.Krishnasett against Mathew Luyis @ Manoj for the realization of money. Both parties were absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 13th day of August, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.Krishnasett
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mathew Luyis @ Manoj
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.R Sajeesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Boris Poul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Pooja Sekhar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Shibu. F
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.Krishnasett vs Mathew Luyis @ Manoj regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M.Krishnasett vs Mathew Luyis @ Manoj regarding realisation of money.