Case Summary
M.K.Rangasuth, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Shalini S. for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure. The case resulted in the plaintiff being absent, leading to the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.K.Rangasuth
- Party Age
- 79
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shalini S.
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pallimon R. Manoj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Case between M.K.Rangasuth vs Shalini S. regarding mandatory, prohibitory injunction. > Case advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for mandatory, prohibitory injunction u/s 26 O VII Rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.K.Rangasuth vs Shalini S. regarding mandatory, prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between M.K.Rangasuth vs Shalini S. regarding mandatory, prohibitory injunction.