Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 316/2023

Case between Mithun P. Shammu vs Santhosh regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 02/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mithun P. Shammu is the plaintiff who entered into an agreement with defendant Santhosh for the sale of property. The case involves the plaintiff seeking the return of an advance payment after the defendant failed to execute the sale deed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 6,40,000 along with interest. A charge is also placed on the property related to the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay the amount of Rs. 6,40,000 along with 12% interest and a charge over the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 6,40,000 along with interest. A charge is also placed on the property related to the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff remains unchallenged and supports his claim for the amount due from the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff remains unchallenged and supports his claim for the amount due from the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 along with the document marked as Ext.A1, in the absence of any contra evidence proves the case of the plaintiff that the defendant is liable to pay the amount due.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendant is hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 6,40,000/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization and there will be a charge over the plaint schedule property for the amount due from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mithun P. Shammu
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale agreement dated 10.02.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu Antony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of Rs. 6,40,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 6,40,000/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the sale agreement dated 10.02.2023, which outlines the terms under which the defendant agreed to sell the property to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mithun P. Shammu vs Santhosh regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Mithun P. Shammu vs Santhosh regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Fri, 02/10/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohanan vs Sathyan regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jijo Eldhose vs Shajimon George regarding attachment of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajendran Karthavu vs George regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won