Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.05/2025

Case between Misahab vs Kochupathumma et al regarding Partition and Injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Code No.
05
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Misahab, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Kochupathumma and others for partition and injunction. The court delivered a judgment rejecting the plaint for not disclosing a cause of action.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected as it did not disclose any cause of action.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected as it did not disclose any cause of action.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to lack of cause of action as per the Civil Procedure Code.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint is rejected u/o VII Rule 11(a) of Civil Procedure Code as it does not disclose any cause of action.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaint is rejected u/o VII Rule 11(a) of Civil Procedure Code as it does not disclose any cause of action.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Misahab
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochupathumma
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Abdul Nizar
Party Age
78
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Al Jasees
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Faizal Hayathuwan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun.R.Mayyanad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep.T.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Y.Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Vimalnath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaint is rejected as it does not disclose any cause of action.
Evidence:
The plaint is rejected u/o VII Rule 11(a) of Civil Procedure Code as it does not disclose any cause of action.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won