Case Summary
The plaintiff, Mini @ Saramma, filed a suit for Declaration, Partition and Injunction against the defendants Babu, Reena and Ponnamma. The court found the plaintiff absent and the case was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaintiff rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mini @ Saramma
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reena
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ponnamma
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Francis Jude Netto
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.S.Manohar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suresh Kumar.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mini @ Saramma vs Babu, Reena, Ponnamma regarding Declaration, Partition and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mini @ Saramma vs Babu, Reena, Ponnamma regarding Declaration, Partition and Injunction