Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 67/2024

Case between Mercy Charley vs Dhanya C. regarding eviction from rented property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-25
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months 7 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mercy Charley is the landlord seeking the eviction of Dhanya C., the tenant, who has not vacated the premises after the lease expired. The petitioner claims the respondent has been in arrears of rent and has refused to leave despite a legal notice and an eviction notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioner within 30 days. The court also orders the respondent to pay the costs of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioner within 30 days. The court also orders the respondent to pay the costs of the petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrefuted evidence demonstrated that the rent was in arrears and that the landlord had a bonafide need for the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrefuted evidence demonstrated that the rent was in arrears and that the landlord had a bonafide need for the property.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 established her case as pleaded. It shows that the rent is in arrears. The bonafide need was also projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mercy Charley
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhanya C.
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lawyer’s notice dated 10.05.2022, Certified copy of lease agreement dated 18.07.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Radhakrishna Pillai G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.A. Shine
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the premises in favor of the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was issued by the petitioner to the respondent regarding eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is related to the petitioner's claim for eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal notice with original A/D
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the petitioner's claim regarding the notice served to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending a legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certified copy of the lease agreement establishes the terms of the tenancy.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Plaint in OS 424/2022
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the plaint that was filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Plaint in OS 890/2022
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the plaint that was filed by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the filing of FIR related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the petitioner supporting her claims.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mercy Charley vs Dhanya C. regarding eviction from rented property
Case Code Year
Case between Mercy Charley vs Dhanya C. regarding eviction from rented property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/18/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown