Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.84/2013

Case between Meenu et al vs Sherly et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
The Additional Munsiff, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Meenu, filed a suit for a Permanent Prohibitory Injunction against the defendants including Sherly. The suit faced dismissal due to the absence of the plaintiffs and defendants during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and defendants, with no steps taken.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and defendants, with no steps taken.
Key Reasoning:
No representation was made by the plaintiffs, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. D1 to D3 absent. No representation. No step taken.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Meenu
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasannakumar
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalitha Bai
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sherly
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Edison Vincent
Relation
Addl.D2
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Betcy Merry Edison
Relation
Addl.D3
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary
Relation
Addl.D4
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R.R.Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.Sajeendra Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Boris Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Manaccadu Badarudeen Koya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Meenu et al vs Sherly et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Meenu et al vs Sherly et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won