Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 128/2024

Case between MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL SULAIKHA vs MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL KUNHIMOOSA et al regarding partition and separate possession

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a suit for partition and separate possession involving the plaintiff and two defendants. The plaintiff seeks to partition the plaint schedule property into 7 equal parts, claiming her 4 out of 7 share.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff for partition and separate possession of her share in the property. A preliminary decree was passed regarding the partition of the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and separate possession of 4/7 share of the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff for partition and separate possession of her share in the property. A preliminary decree was passed regarding the partition of the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit, documents submitted the claim of the plaintiff stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaint schedule property is divided into 7 equal parts and the plaintiff is entitled to get her 4/7 share over the plaint schedule property and is entitled for partition and separate possession over her respective share in metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL SULAIKHA
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL KUNHIMOOSA
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL NAFEESA
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partition Deed, Release Deed executed in favour of Sulaikha, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. M. Kuttikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaint schedule property is divided into 7 equal parts and the plaintiff is entitled to get her 4/7 share.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule property is divided into 7 equal parts and the plaintiff is entitled to get her 4/7 share over the plaint schedule property and is entitled for partition and separate possession over her respective share in metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The 1st defendant is entitled to get partition and separate possession over his 2/7 share.
Evidence:
The 1st defendant is entitled to get partition and separate possession over his 2/7 share over the plaint schedule property allotted to him.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The 2nd defendant is entitled to get partition and separate possession over her 1/7 share.
Evidence:
The 2nd defendant is entitled to get partition and separate possession over her 1/7 share over the plaint schedule property allotted to her.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Equity, reservations, and questions regarding future profits.
Evidence:
The equity, reservations and question with regard to future profits shall be worked out in the final decree stage.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Application for a commission to measure out and effect partition.
Evidence:
The plaintiff shall apply for a commission to measure out and effect partition in the final decree proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed entered in between Pocker, Kunhammad and Kunhipathu.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Release Deed executed by Kunhipathu, Ayisu and Suhara in favour of Sulaikha.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer, Chekkiad to Sulaikha and two others.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL SULAIKHA vs MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL KUNHIMOOSA et al regarding partition and separate possession
Case Code Year
Case between MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL SULAIKHA vs MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL KUNHIMOOSA et al regarding partition and separate possession

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won