Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 83/2018

Case between Meena George vs M/s. Bhagyaodayam Company Ltd. et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-06-11
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 06/11/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the plaintiff Meena George who filed a suit against M/s. Bhagyaodayam Company Ltd. and its Managing Director Paul Joseph. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of instruction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit due to her absence and failure to provide necessary instructions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit due to her absence and failure to provide necessary instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not available for evidence and no instruction reported.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Meena George
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Bhagyaodayam Company Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Managing Director & Chairman Paul Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Joseph
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.K Ajithkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Madhu N Namboothiripad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldhose M Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashok B Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjum R Naik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.S Gireesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Salih P.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thejalakhmi R.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aaron Zacharias Benny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff's case was dismissed due to their absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not available for evidence and no instruction reported. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Meena George vs M/s. Bhagyaodayam Company Ltd. et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Meena George vs M/s. Bhagyaodayam Company Ltd. et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/11/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won