Case Summary
Mathew T. Joseph filed a petition for partitioning a property against Aleykutty Kuriakose and others. The court heard the case and passed a final decree allocating specific plots to each party.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allotted specific plots of land as per the final decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree dividing the property among the parties. Specific plots were allocated to the plaintiff and each defendant as per the court's findings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The division of property was made according to the preliminary decree and the commissioner's report.
The division of property was made according to the preliminary decree and the commissioner's report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The division of property was made according to the preliminary decree and the commissioner's report.
The division of property was made according to the preliminary decree and the commissioner's report.
Supporting Evidence
The court has appointed an Advocate commissioner for effecting partition of the property. Accordingly the Advocate commissioner has filed a report and plans making division of the plaint schedule property among the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result. final decree passed as follows; The plaintiff (Mathew T. Joseph) is allotted Plot No.3, 'FGHIJOF' as shown in C1(a) plan, having an extent of 24.30 Are comprised in Resurvey No.304/1 in Block No.46 of Anickadu Village in Kottayam Taluk.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew T. Joseph
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aleykutty Kuriakose
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Scaria T. Joseph
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Gupta
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph T Joseph
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rosamma Joseph
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Raju Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff and defendants were allotted specific plots as per the final decree.
Evidence:
In the result. final decree passed as follows; The plaintiff (Mathew T. Joseph) is allotted Plot No.3, 'FGHIJOF' as shown in C1(a) plan, having an extent of 24.30 Are comprised in Resurvey No.304/1 in Block No.46 of Anickadu Village in Kottayam Taluk.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate commissioner for effecting partition of the property.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The plan is used to illustrate the division of the property as part of the final decree.
Reference:
C1(a)
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The plan is used to illustrate the division of the property as part of the final decree.
Reference:
C1(b)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew T. Joseph vs Aleykutty Kuriakose et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew T. Joseph vs Aleykutty Kuriakose et al regarding partition of property