Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 231/2024

Case between Mathew James vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew James is the plaintiff in this case against Upayog Nidhi Limited. The matter was brought before the court but was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court heard the matter and concluded that the plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter is not pressed, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court heard the matter and concluded that the plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter is not pressed, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the matter, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the matter, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits matter is not pressed and filed a memo to that effect.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew James
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Upayog Nidhi Limited
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese Vinu C.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits matter is not pressed and filed a memo to that effect. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew James vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew James vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won