O.S No. 416/2016

Case between Mathew Francis Alappat vs Suby brown et al regarding Enforcement Petition

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-06-12

Duration

Case Closed

Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew Francis Alappat is the plaintiff seeking enforcement of a decree against the defendants, Suby brown and Rohny J. John. The court dismissed the enforcement petition due to lack of specifics on the alleged violations of the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the enforcement petition due to insufficient details on how the defendants violated the decree.

Key Reasoning:
The E.P lacked specifics regarding the alleged violations of the decree.

Why Defendant Won:
The E.P lacked specifics regarding the alleged violations of the decree.

Supporting Evidence

The E.P lacks averments as to how the Judgment Debtor’s herein have violated the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I am of the opinion that this E.P need not be positively entertained now and is therefore dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mathew Francis Alappat
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suby brown
Party Age: 40
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rohny J. John
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Biju Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Johnson Mathew Manayani
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The E.P was filed for the enforcement of a prohibitory injunction.

Evidence:

But however, the E.P lacks averments as to how the Judgment Debtor’s herein have violated the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification