Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P 15/2024 in O.S 625/1989

Case between Manomaniyamma vs Mathew C Thottakkad et al regarding execution of decree

Court
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Judge
Smt.Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-09
Duration
approximately-29 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manomaniyamma filed an execution petition to enforce a decree dated 27.07.1995 against Mathew C Thottakkad and others. The defendants argued that the execution petition is barred by limitation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the execution petition on the grounds that it was barred by limitation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition on the grounds that it was barred by limitation.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was found to be barred by limitation due to the dismissal of prior appeals and the lack of merit in the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was found to be barred by limitation due to the dismissal of prior appeals and the lack of merit in the petition.
Supporting Evidence
Hence the present Execution petition is not maintainable and is barred by limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the above circumstances, it can be held that Execution Petition is barred by limitation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manomaniyamma
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew C Thottakkad
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Eliyamma Cheriyan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K R Krishnan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kumaran Kutty Menon
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayaraj Menon
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanush V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G Jayasankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Execution Petition filed to execute the decree by effecting delivery of decree schedule property.
Evidence:
the present Execution petition is not maintainable and is barred by limitation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Execution Petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court used this document to determine the execution of the decree and assess the limitation period.
Reference:
Ext. C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Barred by limitation
Case Code
Case between Manomaniyamma vs Mathew C Thottakkad et al regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Manomaniyamma vs Mathew C Thottakkad et al regarding execution of decree

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/27/1995 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Principal Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won