OS. No.867/2018

Case between Manoj et al vs Sreelatha Amma et al regarding Fixation of boundary and injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-08-16

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Manoj and Sindhu, filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction against the defendants, Sreelatha Amma and Raveendran Pillai. However, the plaintiff was absent during the final hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the final hearing. The court noted that no representation was made by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the final hearing. The court noted that no representation was made by the plaintiffs.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent and no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Manoj
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sindhu
Party Age: 46
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sreelatha Amma
Party Age: 62
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Raveendran Pillai
Party Age: 65
Relation: H/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: V.L.Baby
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R.Geetha
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Nisha L.Prakash
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

The suit for fixation of boundary and injunction was dismissed.

Evidence: