Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 227 OF 2017

Case between Mannoothodukayil Muhammed vs Palakkal Moideen's children et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mannoothodukayil Muhammed is the plaintiff in this case, which involves a suit for injunction against the defendants, the children of Palakkal Moideen. The court allowed the interim application and returned the plaint to be presented before the proper forum.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the interim application IA 369/19 and returned the plaint to the plaintiff to present before the proper forum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application IA 369/19 and returned the plaint to the plaintiff to present before the proper forum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the injunction application warranted allowance based on presented evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the injunction application warranted allowance based on presented evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the injunction application warranted allowance based on the presented evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 369/19 allowed. Plaint is returned to the plaintiff to present before the proper forum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mannoothodukayil Muhammed
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed
Party Age
67
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Komu
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moideen
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed kutty
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Majeed
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.C.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.V.Vinunath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The suit is for injunction, and the court allowed the IA 369/19.
Evidence:
IA 369/19 allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mannoothodukayil Muhammed vs Palakkal Moideen's children et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mannoothodukayil Muhammed vs Palakkal Moideen's children et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won