Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.92/2025

Case between Manju S. vs K. Natarajan regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt Sreelakshmi C.
Order Date
2025-01-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manju S. filed a petition against K. Natarajan seeking an ad-interim injunction. The court has heard the petition and granted the injunction to prevent K. Natarajan from making changes to the property until a boundary is fixed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, restricting the defendant from making any alterations to the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted until 11/02/2025
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, restricting the defendant from making any alterations to the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from constructing, demolishing, altering or using any portion of plaint A schedule property prior to the fixation of boundary until 11/02/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manju S.
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Natarajan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Renjith C. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from constructing, demolishing, altering or using any portion of plaint A schedule property prior to the fixation of boundary until 11/02/2025
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit. Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from constructing, demolishing, altering or using any portion of plaint A schedule property prior to the fixation of boundary until 11/02/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manju S. vs K. Natarajan regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Manju S. vs K. Natarajan regarding ad-interim injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won