Case Summary
The petitioners, Manju Radakrishnan and Radhakrishnan Nair, filed a petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act concerning a compliance order against the respondent, Hari G. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the previous order requiring the deposit of rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner granted vacant possession of the building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with a previous order requiring payment of rent arrears. The petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to deposit rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to deposit rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to deposit rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to deposit rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manju Radakrishnan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan Nair
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hari G
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreekala C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Karunakaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nandagopan M.C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.S. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manju Radakrishnan et al vs Hari G regarding compliance with rent control order
Case Code Year
Case between Manju Radakrishnan et al vs Hari G regarding compliance with rent control order