Case Summary
Manikuttan filed a suit against Ashokan and Ajil. The plaintiff was not represented in court, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented and did not submit the necessary proof affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not represented. Defendant represented. Proof affidavit not filed. Plaintiff not ready for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manikuttan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashokan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajil
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.Manaph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhashchandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff not represented and not ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manikuttan vs Ashokan et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Manikuttan vs Ashokan et al regarding dismissal for default