Case Summary
The plaintiff, Manikantan, has filed a suit for the realization of money. The defendants include Jeesath, Mohanan Pillai, and others.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
The plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manikantan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jeesath
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohanan Pillai
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunu
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Somasekharan Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prasanth. S.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kannanalloor S. Abdul Karim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for realization of money was dismissed for default due to absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Manikantan vs Jeesath et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Manikantan vs Jeesath et al regarding realization of money.