Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 420/2022

Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd. vs Priya Varma regarding realization of payment for advertising services.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 22 days
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd, is seeking to recover a balance payment of Rs. 40,000 for advertising services rendered to the defendant, Priya Varma. The defendant argues that the payments were made by her husband's proprietorship firm, De Fab In Style, and denies personal liability.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the defendant does not owe any amount to the plaintiff, as the payments were the responsibility of the proprietorship De Fab In Style, not Priya Varma personally.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the defendant does not owe any amount to the plaintiff, as the payments were the responsibility of the proprietorship De Fab In Style, not Priya Varma personally.
Key Reasoning:
The court established that the business transactions were conducted between the plaintiff and De Fab In Style, not with the defendant personally.
Why Defendant Won:
The court established that the business transactions were conducted between the plaintiff and De Fab In Style, not with the defendant personally.
Supporting Evidence
From the evidence and materials before this court, it is not found that the defendant owes any amount to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya Varma
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
True extract of resolution of Board of directors of M/s Maniamkot Advertising Indian Pvt Ltd., Release orders, Lawyer notice, Reply notice, Grihalakshmi features
Defendants Documents
GSTREG, Bakers verification letter, True copy of printout of whatsapp messages

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.A.Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blaze K Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 40,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization for the Managing Director to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Release Orders
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Work orders issued for advertisement by the defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice calling for payment of outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response to the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Advertisement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of advertisement published by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advertisement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of advertisement featuring the defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: GST Registration
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate proving the proprietorship of De Fab In Style.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Account Verification Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document proving existence of De Fab In Style's current account.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: WhatsApp Messages
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of harassment and misuse of relationship by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd. vs Priya Varma regarding realization of payment for advertising services.
Case Code Year
Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd. vs Priya Varma regarding realization of payment for advertising services.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/04/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Arun Paul Alex vs Purva Eternity Apartment Owner's Association regarding temporary injunction and maintenance charges
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Conpac Mix Pvt. Ltd. vs Faizal regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won