Case Summary
This case involves a review petition filed by the plaintiff, Malik.C, against the defendant, Joly Das.C. The court is reviewing a prior order related to the attachment of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The order in IA.1/2022 dated 18-11-2022 is hereby reviewed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition filed by the plaintiff, Malik.C, indicating an oversight in the previous order regarding the attachment of property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court identified errors in the previous order regarding the attachment of the property, which warranted a review.
The court identified errors in the previous order regarding the attachment of the property, which warranted a review.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Upon the above discourses, I am of the view that the petition is liable to be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and the order in IA 1/2022 dated 18-11-2022 is hereby reviewed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Malik.C
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joly Das.C
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Malloor.S.Balagopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Sujeshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.S.Purushothaman Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Keerthi.K.Narayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vinoj Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sreeja.S Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Aparna.M.Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court allowed the review of the order in IA.1/2022 dated 18.11.2022.
Evidence:
Hence the point No.1 is found in favour of the Review petitioner/plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit filed by the plaintiff contains information regarding the apprehension of the defendant attempting to alienate the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed is mentioned as the basis for the property ownership of the defendant, which is sought to be attached.
Reference:
No.4576 dated 13.11.2006
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022