Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 190 OF 2014

Case between Mailadimmal Hamza vs Thachanattil Viswanathan et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-06-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mailadimmal Hamza is the plaintiff against Thachanattil Viswanathan and Thachanatt Thami, who are the defendants. The case involves a suit for injunction which was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff, Mailadimmal Hamza. The defendants were present during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff, Mailadimmal Hamza. The defendants were present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff name called, absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mailadimmal Hamza
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thachanattil Viswanathan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thachanatt Thami
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Vipin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Rafi.E.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff sought an injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mailadimmal Hamza vs Thachanattil Viswanathan et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mailadimmal Hamza vs Thachanattil Viswanathan et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won