Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Mahinkutty and Saidhumma, filed a suit against the defendants, Sainudheen, Ramla, Yoosaf, and Safiya. The court ultimately accepted a compromise agreement between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the terms and conditions of a compromise agreement, while the counter claim was dismissed. The court ordered that the compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court accepted the compromise agreement as lawful.
The court accepted the compromise agreement as lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court accepted the compromise agreement as lawful.
The court accepted the compromise agreement as lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise agreement filed, accepted being lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed as per the terms and conditions of the compromise agreement. Counter claim stands dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahinkutty
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidhumma
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainudheen
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramla
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yoosaf
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Safiya
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.M. Alias
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.V. Shiji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lakhsmi M. Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.A. Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Azeena K.E.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shehsadi Abdul Kareem
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per the terms and conditions of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Compromise agreement filed, accepted being lawful. Suit is decreed as per the terms and conditions of the compromise agreement.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The counter claim stands dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Counter claim stands dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the compromise agreement as lawful and decreed the suit as per its terms.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahinkutty et al vs Sainudheen et al regarding a suit and counter claim based on a compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Mahinkutty et al vs Sainudheen et al regarding a suit and counter claim based on a compromise agreement
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement