Case Summary
The plaintiffs Mahesh E.P. and Remadevi filed a suit against defendants Ashokan and Latha. The case was rejected due to the balance court fee not being paid despite numerous chances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee after several chances were provided.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected on the grounds of non-payment of court fees.
The suit was rejected on the grounds of non-payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected on the grounds of non-payment of court fees.
The suit was rejected on the grounds of non-payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid and despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh E.P.
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Remadevi
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashokan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.R.S Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deena Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepa R. Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Swarna Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mithun C. Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akshay Joseph Adhikaram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thushar Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sona Maria Paulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Divakaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binoi George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saritha U.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiffs' suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid and despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahesh E.P. et al vs Ashokan et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Mahesh E.P. et al vs Ashokan et al regarding suit rejection