Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 571/2025

Case between Madan Mohan vs Mohammed Habeeb M regarding a civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Madan Mohan, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Mohammed Habeeb M, the first defendant, regarding a civil matter. The court addressed a mediation report and delivered its judgment based on a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement reached through mediation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement reached through mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were seen as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were seen as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation report seems to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madan Mohan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Habeeb M
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S.Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aaditya Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ardra Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Diya Merin Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anusree B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sohan Varghese Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshma K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishnendhu V.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Visakh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madan Mohan vs Mohammed Habeeb M regarding a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Madan Mohan vs Mohammed Habeeb M regarding a civil suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won