Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 264/2023

Case between Mable Ignatious et al vs Rafael et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Rafael and Josepheena, are seeking an advocate commissioner to measure and prepare a sketch of property related to their counter claim. The plaintiffs, Mable Ignatious and others, oppose the petition, arguing that the petitioners have no right to restrict access to a public pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure the counter claim properties as requested by the defendants. This is necessary for a fair adjudication of the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure the counter claim properties as requested by the defendants. This is necessary for a fair adjudication of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The appointment of an Advocate Commissioner is necessary for proper evidence collection related to counter claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The appointment of an Advocate Commissioner is necessary for proper evidence collection related to counter claims.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of the surveyor is necessary to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above counter claim on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- 1) Advocate Jomol Pius is appointed as the Commissioner in this case and whose remuneration shall be Rs.10,000/- which shall be paid directly to the Commissioner by defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mable Ignatious
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o Late P A Ignatious
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony Savio
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o Late P A Ignatious
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sylex George
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Late P A Ignatious
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Seeba
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o Late P A Ignatious
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rafael
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o Ouseppunny
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Josepheena
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o Rafael
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanal K M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anup T Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure and prepare a sketch of the counter claim properties.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate Jomol Pius is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to previous commission reports for making a decision on the measurement application.
Reference:
Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendants seek to rely on the title deeds to support their application for measuring the counter claim properties.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court considered oral arguments presented by both sides regarding the rights over the property.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mable Ignatious et al vs Rafael et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mable Ignatious et al vs Rafael et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won