Case Summary
The plaintiffs, M.A.Anzar and Ameer Hamza, filed a suit against the defendant S. Radhakrishnan for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction. The case was heard in the court of Additional Munsiff Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. A counter claim was noted for evidence submission.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, represented. Defendant absent, represented. Counsel for plaintiff submitted that no instruction from plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed. Counter claim evidence to 03/01/2026
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.A.Anzar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ameer Hamza
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S. Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 59
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Silpa Sutheesan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kishore. R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.A.Anzar et al vs S. Radhakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between M.A.Anzar et al vs S. Radhakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction