Case Summary
A M Subair is the plaintiff in this case against defendants Salim P M and Fayas P S. The case was regarding a suit that was ultimately rejected by the court due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Balance court fee not remitted.
Balance court fee not remitted.
Why Defendant Won:
Balance court fee not remitted.
Balance court fee not remitted.
Supporting Evidence
Since Balance Ccurt Fee not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Since Balance Ccurt Fee not remitted suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A M Subair
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Salim P M
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fayas P S
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T V Eldho
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reji Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Since Balance Ccurt Fee not remitted suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A M Subair vs Salim P M et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between A M Subair vs Salim P M et al regarding suit rejection