Case Summary
The case involves M M James as the Decree Holder and M M Mathew and others as Judgment Debtors concerning the execution of a decree. The court reviewed the Execution Petition and closed the matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Delivery effected.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has pronounced delivery and closed the Execution Petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was represented and delivery was completed as ordered.
The decree holder was represented and delivery was completed as ordered.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was represented and delivery was completed as ordered.
The decree holder was represented and delivery was completed as ordered.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder represented. Delivery effected.
Judgment Evidence:
O R D E R Delivery effected. Execution Petition is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M M James
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M M Mathew
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary M M
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Annakutty
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Simi Thomas
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bismi Thomas
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Will
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Josekutty Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution Petition is closed with delivery effected.
Evidence:
Delivery effected. Execution Petition is closed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented as evidence by the Decree Holder.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Will
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented as evidence by the Decree Holder.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Witnesses were examined for the Decree Holder as part of the proceedings.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M M James vs M M Mathew et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between M M James vs M M Mathew et al regarding Execution Petition