Case Summary
The plaintiff, M K Chandran, filed a suit against M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and K K Habeeb. The matter has been settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged that the parties have settled the matter and thus dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M K Chandran
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o late Kumara Pillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K K Habeeb
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o Kunjavaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N S Mohammed Usman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anshad Ameen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Priyadevi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anwin Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saranya Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aditya Venugopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mahesh Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhishek S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rohit P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika B S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed due to settlement between parties.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo stating that matter settled between parties. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M K Chandran vs M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M K Chandran vs M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement