Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1194/2024

Case between Loger Atriumms LLP vs Jibin Paul regarding security for decree amount.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Loger Atriumms LLP has filed a petition against Jibin Paul seeking to direct him to furnish security for a decree amount related to their case. The court has issued an interim attachment for the property in question.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has directed Jibin Paul to furnish security for the decree amount. An ad-interim attachment of the property has also been ordered.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim attachment of property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has directed Jibin Paul to furnish security for the decree amount. An ad-interim attachment of the property has also been ordered.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the intention to defeat the execution of the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the respondent is trying to dispose of the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

Heard the petitioner. Perused the records. I am prima facie satisfied that the respondent with the intent to defeat the execution of decree that may be passed against him is trying to dispose of the petition schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Loger Atriumms LLP
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jibin Paul
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ratheesh N A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jerry Geevarghese Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim attachment of the petition schedule property until the respondent furnishes security.
Evidence:
Meanwhile there will be an ad-interim attachment of petition schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to the respondent to furnish security of Rs. 2,50,000/-.
Evidence:
Hence the respondent is directed to furnish security to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/- on or before 18/12/2024.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This petition seeks to attach property before judgment and request security for the decree amount.
Reference:
I.A. No. 2 /2024

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Loger Atriumms LLP vs Jibin Paul regarding security for decree amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Loger Atriumms LLP vs Jibin Paul regarding security for decree amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won