Case Summary
This case involves Lissykutty as the decree holder and The Secretary of Panayam Grama Panchayath along with a Panchayath Member as judgment debtors. The petition was filed under specific rules of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution of a decree, which was ultimately satisfied.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was filed and was eventually satisfied, resulting in the closure of the EP.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder satisfied the decree as per the counsel's submission.
The decree holder satisfied the decree as per the counsel's submission.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder represented. Decree satisfied, counsel submitted and filed memo.
Judgment Evidence:
Decree satisfied, counsel submitted and filed memo vide CF.No.2080/25 by stating that EP not pressed as decree satisfied. Hence EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lissykutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Secretary, Panayam Grama Panchayath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Panchayath Member, Ward No. 5, Panayam Grama Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sheeja.V.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EP not pressed as decree satisfied.
Evidence:
Decree satisfied, counsel submitted and filed memo vide CF.No.2080/25 by stating that EP not pressed as decree satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lissykutty vs The Secretary, Panayam Grama Panchayath regarding execution of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Lissykutty vs The Secretary, Panayam Grama Panchayath regarding execution of decree.