OS No.169/2012

Case between Linjo Josheph vs Rajendran et al regarding petition filed under Order XXI Rule 10,11 and 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Court

Munsiff Court, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A

Order Date

2025-08-14

Duration

approximately-13 years

Case Closed

Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by the decree holder Linjo Josheph against the judgment debtors Rajendran and Omana. The petition was dismissed for default due to absence of representation from the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The petition filed by Linjo Josheph was dismissed for default due to continuous absence and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was continuously absent with no representation.

Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was continuously absent with no representation.

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner absent, no representation. DH called absent no representation on his part, continuously absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Linjo Josheph
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajendran
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Omana
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Adv.Sujith Chandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Adv.Nil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petition dismissed for default due to absence of the petitioner and no representation.

Evidence:

(Petitioner absent, no representation. DH called absent no representation on his part, continuously absent, no representation. Petition dismissed for default.)

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification