Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 384/ 2023

Case between Lilly vs Prasannan regarding disturbances to property boundaries.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri.ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lilly, the plaintiff, claims that Prasannan is making disturbances to the boundaries of her property. Prasannan denies these allegations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, and both parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding the property boundaries.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, and both parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding the property boundaries.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petition valid based on the materials presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
After considering the material, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and both parties are directed to maintain status quo as reported by the Adv. Commissioner as per the report dated 21/09/2023.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lilly
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasannan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Saj. S. Sivan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Both parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding the boundaries of the property.
Evidence:
the petition can be allowed and both parties can be directed to maintain status quo.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Advocate Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the Advocate Commissioner's report dated 21/09/2023 to determine the status of the boundaries in relation to the property.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lilly vs Prasannan regarding disturbances to property boundaries.
Case Code Year
Case between Lilly vs Prasannan regarding disturbances to property boundaries.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won