Case Summary
Lijo Paul is the plaintiff and Omana Vijayan is the defendant in this case. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was not present to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any evidence or request for an adjournment.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present to adduce evidence. No petition seen filed to adjourn the case also.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open Court on this the 10th day of January, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lijo Paul
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omana Vijayan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Reghukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shyja C.P.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.V.Eldho
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lijo Paul vs Omana Vijayan regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Lijo Paul vs Omana Vijayan regarding dismissal for default