Case Summary
An interlocutory application was filed by Leelavathy seeking relief under Civil Procedure Code, which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interlocutory relief under Civil Procedure Code
Case Type
Civil Suit - Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interlocutory application filed by Leelavathy.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Petition filed u/o 26 Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code. IA 1726/2018 allowed. Hence FD IA is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leelavathy
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o Unni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ranjith
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o Leelavathy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasmi
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- W/o Satheesh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishnu
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- S/o Unni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thilakavathy
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o Damodaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramya
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- W/o Shiju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vaisakh
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o Damodaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o Damodaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devaki
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o Chandran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o Vasu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thanka
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o Krishnanunni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul Krishna
- Party Age
- 11
- Relation
- Represented by guardian mother Thanka
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ranjusha
- Party Age
- 6
- Relation
- Represented by guardian mother Thanka
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abdul Hameed.P.P.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Interlocutory Relief under Civil Procedure Code
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Interlocutory relief sought by Leelavathy
Evidence:
Petition filed u/o 26 Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code. IA 1726/2018 allowed. Hence FD IA is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leelavathy et al vs Ranjith et al regarding Interlocutory Application under Civil Procedure Code
Case Code Year
Case between Leelavathy et al vs Ranjith et al regarding Interlocutory Application under Civil Procedure Code