Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.535/2019

Case between Leelavathy et al vs Joseph alias Joshi et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-07
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 10/07/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leelavathy and others are the plaintiffs, while Joseph and others are the defendants. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case because the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case because the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Supporting Evidence
Not applicable.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with the matter. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leelavathy
Party Age
87
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sathiyavathi Sasidharan
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasikala N.K.
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph alias Joshi
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cini
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mayadevi N
Party Age
76
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.Rajesh
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.Resmi
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.B. Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Shyam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with the matter. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leelavathy et al vs Joseph alias Joshi et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Leelavathy et al vs Joseph alias Joshi et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/07/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won