Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 1161/2015

Case between Leela.G. et al vs Ambika et al regarding setting aside the Deeds.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-02
Duration
approximately-10 years
Case Code No.
1161
Case Closed
Tue, 12/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Leela.G., G. Ambi @ Geetha, Remani.G., and Lalitha.G. against defendants Ambika and Rema.G. The suit was filed for setting aside certain deeds but was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation, awarding costs to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation, awarding costs to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff absent and no representation.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela.G.
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
G. Ambi @ Geetha
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remani.G.
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalitha.G.
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ambika
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rema.G.
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.L.Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sumith Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Omanakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won