Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 882/2023

Case between Leela vs Ratheesh regarding injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leela and Remya are the plaintiffs filing for an injunction against the defendant Ratheesh. The matter was settled by compromise during mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed based on the compromise reached between the parties during mediation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees paid by the Plaintiffs to be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed based on the compromise reached between the parties during mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a compromise during mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a compromise during mediation.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remya
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Pavithran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nisha L. Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeeva K. Thankam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Latha Mole
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise between the parties.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leela vs Ratheesh regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Leela vs Ratheesh regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won