Case Summary
Leela Mukundan.M.K filed a suit against Ramankutty. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the defendant was also not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendant at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had no bona fides in her non-appearance.
The court found that the plaintiff had no bona fides in her non-appearance.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had no bona fides in her non-appearance.
The court found that the plaintiff had no bona fides in her non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
There was no representation for the plaintiff today also. Hence, the Suit is dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela Mukundan.M.K
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramankutty
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificate regarding plaintiff's ailments.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.K.Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Sathisan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Rahman T.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Medical Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The medical certificate was produced as evidence to support the plaintiff's absence due to health issues.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leela Mukundan.M.K vs Ramankutty regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Leela Mukundan.M.K vs Ramankutty regarding dismissal for default