Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1438/2019

Case between Leela M S et al vs Santhosh regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leela M S and T R Lawrence are the plaintiffs in this case against Santhosh. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed for default due to their lack of presence and readiness to proceed with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed for default due to their lack of presence and readiness to proceed with the case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to pursue the case and were continuously absent.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to pursue the case and were continuously absent.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff, Defendant represented. Counsel for plaintiff submitted that there is no instruction from plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela M S
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T R Lawrence
Party Age
74
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Premchand R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rameez Nooh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil S Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Radhika Rajasekharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anila Peter
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudheesh S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajen Thampan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shiva Sharath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Hence court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leela M S et al vs Santhosh regarding dismissal of suit for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Leela M S et al vs Santhosh regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won