Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.179/2021

Case between Lathika Kumari alias Kumari Lathika vs Thyagarajan.P regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lathika Kumari alias Kumari Lathika filed a suit against Thyagarajan.P for recovery of a loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/- that was not repaid. The defendant failed to appear in court, and the plaintiff's claims were supported by evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree for the recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹5,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree for the recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and sufficient to prove the debt owed by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹5,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lathika Kumari alias Kumari Lathika
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thyagarajan.P
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory note dated 28/01/2019, Cheque No.022061 dated 30/05/2020, Original of agreement dated 27/01/2020, Return memo report dated 07/08/2020, Lawyer’s notice dated 04/09/2020.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. D. Arun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Abhijith.D.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. L.Sandhya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹5,00,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled for a decree for realization of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant as prayed for.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant undertaking to repay the amount on demand.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the defendant for the amount claimed.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Return Memo Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the failed delivery of legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card acknowledging receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant's reply to the legal notice, which admitted liability.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Lathika Kumari alias Kumari Lathika vs Thyagarajan.P regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Lathika Kumari alias Kumari Lathika vs Thyagarajan.P regarding recovery of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/28/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won