Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.676/2024

Case between Lathakumari vs Sajeev regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lathakumari filed a suit against Sajeev for realization of money. The subject matter of this suit was settled between the parties in a mediation session, resulting in a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The compromise between the parties has been accepted, and the suit is decreed accordingly. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees paid by the Plaintiffs to be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The compromise between the parties has been accepted, and the suit is decreed accordingly. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties had adjusted the plaintiff's claim as a whole by the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaintiff's claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lathakumari
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeev
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Sankara Narayana Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Bimal Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tijo Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soumya Swaminathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathakumari vs Sajeev regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Lathakumari vs Sajeev regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won