Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 584/2022

Case between Latha vs Saraswathy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Latha, is the absolute owner of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Saraswathy, who has attempted to encroach upon her property. The defendant has not appeared in court despite due service of summons.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit by restraining the defendant from causing any damage to the compound wall of the plaintiff's property and from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant and her men are restrained from causing damage to the compound wall and from interfering in the peaceful enjoyment of the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially decreed the suit by restraining the defendant from causing any damage to the compound wall of the plaintiff's property and from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving her case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving her case.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1, A2 and C1 series and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving her case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed in part as follows: (i) The defendant and her men are hereby restrained from causing any damage to, or demolishing any portion of the compound wall situated on the western and southern sides of the plaint A schedule property, and from encroaching upon any portion of the A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prameela. C
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o.late Kochani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathy
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1 is the certified copy of Settlement deed No.4590/2008 of Eravipuram SRO, dated 07/11/2008; Ext.A2 is the land tax receipt dated 27/05/2022 issued from Village Office, Vadakkevila.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Elgin Thampi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reeja A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant and her men are restrained from causing any damage to, or demolishing any portion of the compound wall and from encroaching upon any portion of the A schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant and her men are hereby restrained from causing any damage to, or demolishing any portion of the compound wall situated on the western and southern sides of the plaint A schedule property, and from encroaching upon any portion of the A schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant and her men are also restrained from interfering in the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant and her men are also restrained from interfering in the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 4590/2008 of Eravipuram SRO, establishing plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt dated 27/05/2022 issued from Village Office, Vadakkevila.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and mahassar prepared by Advocate Commissioner Anilkumar.A.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha vs Saraswathy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Latha vs Saraswathy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 04/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won