Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 36/2021

Case between Latha et al vs Prakash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Latha and her children, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Prakash and others. Both sides were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiffs' application as both sides were absent and sought time for BCF.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiffs' application as both sides were absent and sought time for BCF.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 14th day of August, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepthi
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepika
Party Age
19
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prakash
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasannakumari
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheela
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prince
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Permanent prohibitory injunction application.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kishore.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shamla S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raji G.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction filed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injuction u/S 26 OI,IV, V, VI & VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha et al vs Prakash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Latha et al vs Prakash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won