Case Summary
The plaintiff, Lalji, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The counter claim was dismissed as not pressed by the counter claim plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The counter claim was dismissed as not pressed, and therefore, there was no continuation of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Counter claim dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lalji
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leelakumari
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shylaja
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini. S.Sudarsan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kannanalloor S.Abdul karim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G.Devarajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Leelavathi Amma
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction requested by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/s 26 u/O VII R.1 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lalji vs Leelakumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Lalji vs Leelakumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction