Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 923/2022

Case between Lakshmi Ramachandran vs E.K. Kesavan et al regarding non prosecution

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2026-01-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Lakshmi Ramachandran, was involved in a suit against defendants E.K. Kesavan and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for non prosecution due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for non prosecution due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides no representation. Plaintiff continuously absent for last several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further. Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lakshmi Ramachandran
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.K. Kesavan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.K. Rajan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnankutty
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o. Late
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunila K.K.
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o late
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anila K.K
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o. Late
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.K. Hema
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arunima N.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gowri A.H.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin Raj Vettikkadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjo Francis
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjala Nazain Subair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for non prosecution due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further. Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lakshmi Ramachandran vs E.K. Kesavan et al regarding non prosecution
Case Code Year
Case between Lakshmi Ramachandran vs E.K. Kesavan et al regarding non prosecution

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won