Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.549 OF 2018

Case between Laila et al vs Nediyil Hamzakutty regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-04-13
Duration
2 years 5 months 24 days
Case Closed
Fri, 04/13/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed an application to set aside ex-parte decree regarding an injunction case, citing health reasons for their absence during trial.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioners were allowed to set aside the ex-parte decree with a condition to pay the respondent Rs.6,000 by a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allow setting aside ex-parte decree with condition to pay Rs.6,000 to respondent
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners were allowed to set aside the ex-parte decree with a condition to pay the respondent Rs.6,000 by a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioners showed valid reasons for their absence and were given an opportunity to provide their contentions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioners showed valid reasons for their absence and were given an opportunity to provide their contentions.
Supporting Evidence
Not clear. This might be the exact text or reasoning provided by the court for granting relief.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000/- (Rupees six thousand only) by the petitioners to the respondent on or before 25.05.2018.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Laila
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nediyil Hamzakutty
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Setting aside ex-parte decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allow the petitioners to set aside the ex-parte decree with condition of paying Rs.6,000 to the respondent
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000/- (Rupees six thousand only) by the petitioners to the respondent on or before 25.05.2018.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Laila et al vs Nediyil Hamzakutty regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Laila et al vs Nediyil Hamzakutty regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 04/13/2018 - 12:00
From
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won